ZEUS Information

    This page presents information on ZONA's Euler Unsteady Solver (ZEUS) software. Several validation test cases are also shown.

 What is ZEUS?

  • ZEUS is an ZONA’s Euler Unsteady aerodynamic solver to provide aeroelastic solutions for complex configurations.
  • It uses Cartesian grid and employs boundary layer coupling.
  • Cell-centered finite volume method using Jameson’s artificial dissipation scheme.
  • Dual-time stepping algorithm for unsteady solution.
  • Automated mesh generation scheme that requires only the surface mesh for input.
  • Overset grid capability for complex configuration.
  • Includes ZAERO's 3D spline module and Nastran modal solution importer.
  • Multi-grid acceleration for fast solution convergence.
  • Generates either time-domain aeroelastic responses or frequency-domain generalized aerodynamic forces for flutter, LCO, and static/trim aeroelastic analysis.

 Completely Automated Mesh Generation Scheme

  • Because ZEUS solves the Euler’s equation with a small disturbance boundary condition, all required geometric information existing in ZAERO is sufficient for ZEUS input.
  • ZEUS mesh is generated by an automated mesh generation scheme.
  • Fuselage, wing, horizontal tail, vertical tail, launcher and pylons can be fitted into a single block of mesh.
  • Tip missile with fins and under wing stores can be fitted into other blocks of mesh, respectively.
  • Communication between blocks of mesh is accomplished through the overset grid scheme.
  • Each block of mesh is automatically generated by a Y-Zone technique.
  • 95% of the input for ZEUS is identical to that of ZAERO.

 Y-Zone Technique For Automated Mesh Generation

All components within each block are projected on an X-Y plane. On this X-Y plane, all components are divided into several spanwise zones, called the Y-Zones. The Y-Zone technique can automatically generate the mesh by a line-tracing method that spans across all Y-Zones. An example of division of an aircraft model into spanwise zones is shown at right with descriptions of each zone listed below.

ZONE 1: Left launcher
ZONE 2: Outboard left wing
ZONE 3: Inboard left wing and outboard left horizontal tail
ZONE 4: Outboard left strake and inboard left horizontal tail
ZONE 5: Inboard left strake
ZONE 6: Fuselage
ZONE 7: Inboard right strake
ZONE 8: Outboard right strake and inboard right horizontal tail
ZONE 9: Inboard right wing and outboard right horizontal tail
ZONE 10: Outboard right wing
ZONE 11: Right launcher

 Overset Mesh for Complex Configuartions

 

  • Complex configurations can be modeled by multiple blocks of mesh with over-lapping regions; the overset mesh.
  • Communication of flow solutions among blocks is through the interpolation of solutions in the overlapping regions.
  • Solution convergence is acheived by sub-iterations.


 3D Spline Module

The 3D Spline module establishes the displacement/force transferal between the structural Finite Element Method (FEM) module and the ZEUS surface panel model. It consists of four spline methodsthat jointly assemble a spline matrix. These four spline methods include:
  • Thin Plate Spline
  • Infinite Plate Spline
  • Beam Spline
  • Rigid Body Attachment methods
The spline matrix provides the x, y and z displacements and slopes in three dimensions at all aerodynamic grids.

 

Displacement of ZEUS Panel Model Splined to FEM Model

 

Validation Test Cases


 Steady Subsonic, Transonic, & Supersonic Aerodynamics

 

Validation of Cp on the L51F07 Configuration

ZEUS subsonic and supersonic steady pressure results (invicsid and viscous) for the L51F07 Wing-Body Configuration are compared to wind tunnel results.

          

 

Comparison of Wing Cp, M=0.9, AoA=2°

 

Comparison of Body Cp, M=0.9, AoA=2°

 

Comparison of Wing Cp, M=1.2, AoA=2°

 

Comparison of Body Cp, M=1.2, AoA=2°

 

Lift, Moment and Drag on L56A18 Wing-Body-Tail Configuration

The L56A18 configuration and ZEUS mesh are shown below. The results that follow demonstrate ZEUS' good aerodynamic results as compared to wind tunnel (WT) and other available data.


 

Comparison of Normal Force Coefficient M = 0.80,0.90,0.94,1.03

Comparison of Coefficient of Moment M = 0.80,0.90,0.94,1.03

Comparison of Coefficient of Drag M = 0.80,0.90,0.94,1.03

 

 

 Steady Hypersonic Aerodynamics

Bent-Nose Compact Kinetic Energy Missile (CKEM) with Wrap-around Fins

  • Nine blocks of overset meshes to model the missile body and eight wrap-around fins
  • Block 1: Missile Body
  • Blocks 2-9: Eight wrap-around fins
  • CPU time for each angle of attack case is approximately 10 minutes with one CPU
 

CKEM Model Displaying a Bent Nose Angle

Eight Wrap-Around Fins

Mesh on Y-Z Plane

 

3D View of Mesh

 

Lift and Moment at Mach 0.6

 

 

 Unsteady Transonic Aerodynamics

Steady and Unsteady Cp on LANN Wing

  • M=0.822, α=0.6°
  • Aspect Ratio: 7.92
  • Taper Ratio: 0.4
  • Swept Angle: 25°
  • Twist from root to tip: 2.6° ~ -2.0°
  • Supercritical Airfoil with max t/c = 12%
  • Pitch mode at reduced frequency = 0.102

 

Steady Cp at Four Span Stations

Unsteady Cp (Real Part)

Unsteady Cp (Imaginary Part)

 

 Flexible Aerodynamics Stability Derivatives

S4T Wind Tunnel Flutter Model

5 Blocks

  • Block 1: Aircraft, 133x78x69
  • Block 2: Trail, 55x26x50
  • Block 3: Canard, 75x21x61
  • Block 4: Inbord Engine, 73x24x36
  • Block 5: Outboard Engine, 69x23x41

 

Angle-of-Attack

Trailing Edge Flap

Horizontal Tail

 

  Trim Analysis

  • Interactive process for solving the trim variables such as α, β, p, q, and r as well as aircraft accelerations.
  • Capable of dealing with dertermined trim system as well as over-determined trim system
    (more unknown trim variables than trim equations).
  • Generation of flight loadsand output of NASTRAN FORCE and MOMENT bulk data cards for subsequent detailed stress analysis.

Joined-Wing at M=0.8 and Load Factor = 2.0g

 

F-16 with Under-Wing Stores at M=0.95 and Load Factors = 5.0g

 

  Flutter and LCO Analysis

  • Capable of generating frequency-domain generalized aerodynamic forces and computing flutter boundaries using the g-method.
  • Transient response analysis for LCO predictions.

Flutter Analysis of Goland Wing

           

LCO Analysis of Goland Wing

      

  Flutter and LCO Analysis of the F-16 with Stores

 

24 Mesh Blocks Used to Model the Whole Aircraft with Under-wing Stores

 

Splined Structural Modes on the Aerodynamic Mesh

 

F-16 Tip Launcher Acceleration at AoA = 2.2° and Re=4.6x106

 

  Flutter of the Twin Engine Transporter

  • Flutter model was tested in NASA Langley Transonic Dynamic Tunnel (TDT) with heavy gas.
  • Between M=0.77 to 0.82, two flutter modes were found; the Wing/Nacelle mode (17Hz) and the wing tip (22Hz).
  • The Wing/Nacelle mode has low unstable damping (hump mode).
  • Dynamic pressure can be continuosly increased without damaging the model until encountering the wing tip flutter mode.
  • Beyond M=0.82, the unstable damping of the Wing/Nacelle becomes high which can lead to the destruction of the wing due to flutter. For this reason, the wing-tip flutter mode condition cannot be reached.

 

  • 12 natural modes are included in the flutter analysis.
  • The infinite plate spline method (for the wing and pylon) and thin plate spline method (for the fuselage and Nacelle) are used to transfer the modes from the structural grid to the aerodynamic grid.

 

Two Blocks of Overset Mesh are used:
  • Block 1: Fuselage, Wing, and pylon, 122x52x61
  • Block 2: Engine Nacelle, 61x41x20


 

  • The 17Hz hump mode predicted by ZEUS correlates with the low unstable damping of the Wing/Nacelle mode observed in the TDT.
  • The flutter boundary of wing-tip mode predicted by ZEUS agrees well with TDT data while ZAERO linear aerodynamics largely
    over-predict the flutter boundary.

 

 

 

 

Terms of Use • Trademarks • Privacy Statement Webmaster
©2010 ZONA Technology, Inc. All Rights Reserved Worldwide.

EditRegion1
ZONA TECHNOLOGY INC.